5/29/2023 0 Comments Deja vu flintIt is worth noting that these are some of the oldest déjà vu theories, and none have any empirical evidence to back them up. This category of explanations can be further split into four types, depending on which processes are imagined to have uncoupled. In a nutshell, dual processing theories suggest that two cognitive processes that normally run in parallel are, for a moment, uncoupled. None of the following theories holds all of the answers, but each gives a unique opportunity to revel in the paper-thin yet remarkably robust experience that we call consciousness. The region of the brain associated with déjà vu may have been pinned down, but what causes it? In general, theories of déjà vu fit into four categories: A case study published in 2001 recounts the experience of a mentally healthy 39-year-old male who experienced recurrent déjà vu when taking amantadine and phenylpropanolamine together to treat flu. For instance, there are multiple reports of troops experiencing déjà vu as they approach battle.ĭrugs: Certain drugs may increase the likelihood of a bout of déjà vu. Stress: Other studies have demonstrated that déjà vu is more common when we are particularly tired, stressed, or both. One study carried out in 1967 found that only 11 percent of people who never traveled experienced déjà vu, compared with 41 percent of those who made between one and four trips per year, and 44 percent of those traveling five or more times per year. Travel: People who travel more frequently are more likely to experience déjà vu. Social: According to some studies, déjà vu is more common among people from higher socioeconomic groups and more highly educated individuals. Gender: Men and women seem to experience it at roughly the same frequency. So, what do we know about the experience?Īge: Déjà vu appears to occur more commonly in younger people, steadily becoming less common as we age. In UK and Australian cinemas May 5, and US theaters May 6.Although it is considered bad form to alert readers to the conclusions of an article prematurely, we still do not know why or how déjà vu occurs. Sure, Raimi’s latest Marvel entry is a theme-park ride, lighter on character development and heavier on gnarly shit that may signal a shift into a darker, more deranged phase of superhero storytelling. And the much-publicised cameos – yes, there are plenty – should thrill comic-book lovers used to seeing random heroes pop up in one-issue storylines. Cumberbatch’s Strange, meanwhile, whose line in arrogant charm is particularly well-tuned now, is still finding pathos amid the out-there visuals of his standalone films.Īlso amping up the sense of fun is Danny Elfman’s delirious score and some (we hope knowingly) cheesy dialogue. She’s on form as a bereaved mum desperate to be reunited with the children she lost, and relishes every moment of horror that’s thrown at her. Newcomer Xochitl Gomez is endearing as the portal-travelling Chavez, while Olsen makes a welcome return as Scarlet Witch, elevating her whole ‘prodigal Avenger’ arc. It’s a reminder of what we love about Sam Raimi, even if non-MCU devotees might get lost in the callbacks (And they probably won’t be sitting through a Doctor Strange sequel in the first place.) There’s a couple of McGuffins in the form of two magic books representing good and evil, and a lot of wacky interdimensional travel, as Strange tries to track them down to prevent his universe collapsing with his new kinda-mentee, America Chavez. Non-MCU devotees might get lost amid all these callbacks, but at its heart, this is a simple tale of whether the price of happiness is worth the moral cost. The story sees Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) and Wanda Maximoff (aka Scarlet Witch, aka Elizabeth Olsen) coming to terms with the magical choices they’ve already made: his, in saving the world through his actions in Avengers: Infinity War hers, in the false reality she conjured out of her grief in WandaVision. Screenwriter Michael Waldron has to pick up from multiple story threads left over from multiple other Marvel shows and movies, but does a solid job in delivering a mostly self-contained adventure. His nose for those old Spidey themes of responsibility and power, meanwhile, manifest in the three suitably weighty central performances. While Benedict Cumberbatch’s original solo outing, directed by Scott Derrickson, delivered a cerebral LSD trip with a sinister inflection, Raimi’s penchant for gore is executed to euphoric effect. Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness is a solid reminder of what we love about Sam Raimi’s brand of moviemaking: both superhero ( Spider-Man 2 ) and horror ( Evil Dead II).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |